SMARTER IN 10

)..

1. Updated Household Spending on AI

Household AI spending. "Both the share of households paying for AI, and their average monthly spend, continue to climb-monthly spend has increased even more steeply, rising ~25% since the beginning of the year." 

..

2. Public Company Corporate Insider Sales

US Corporate Insiders Are Selling Stocks at a Near Record Pace  By Michael Msika 

US executives are selling shares at the second-fastest pace in more than 20 years, a classic red flag to some investors because it suggests people with the most corporate knowledge are wary about markets.

..

3. IPO Performance Since 2019-Torsten Slok

..

4. Google First Negative Cash Flow Quarter in 10 Years

..

5. U.S. Wages and Salaries vs. GDP

.

6. What Does the U.S. Import from Canada and Mexico?

.

7. Home Affordability-The U.S. has been Here Before

Home Affordability: Better Than Headlines Suggest by Lance Roberts of Real Investment Advice, 7/21/26
Boomers Did Not Have It Easy
Here’s the part the narrative skips. The Boomer who bought in 1980 financed at a 30-year fixed rate of 13.74%, watched it climb past 18% by October 1981, and had no way to know rates would ever come back down, which made every payment feel like a life sentence.5 Think about that. For a median home price of $64,600 with 20% down, that household sent roughly 39% of its income to the mortgage before property taxes.6 Add the taxes, and the typical 1980 family spent close to 47% of their income on housing.
Today’s buyer, financing about $417,000 near 6.5%, spends closer to 32% on the mortgage and about 43% all in.6,14 Two independent analyses ran this exact math and landed in the same place. On the payment that matters, 1980 was as hard as, or harder than, 2026. So home affordability today is mostly a payment story, and the payment math favors the present. Notice what the work did. It isn’t the price of the home, it’s the rate.

.

8. Global Opinions of U.S. vs. China

..

9. China Making Women Miserable -Semafor

40% of Russian Trade Now with China

..

10. This Is How To Live A Good Life: 5 Secrets From Ancient Wisdom

Here’s how to live a good life...

• You Are What You Repeatedly Do: Character is a practice, not a personality trait. Every action is a rep.

• If You're Still Fighting Temptation, You Haven't Arrived: You can’t build a good life out of stop signs. Instead of resisting temptation, learn to love better things.

• Happiness Is an Activity, Not a Mood: Ask, “Am I making proper use of myself?”

• Study Manipulation Even If You Hate Manipulators: Nobody thinks oncologists are evil because they study cancer. And they wouldn’t be able to fight cancer if they didn’t understand it.

• Humans Cannot Flourish Alone: Modern culture asks, “What can this relationship do for me?” An Aristotelian asks, “What kind of person does this relationship help me become?https://bakadesuyo.com/about/

..

Longevity Science 2026: 5 Findings Worth Knowing

By SUCCESS Staff

Most of what people believe about aging was formed decades ago, when the science was thinner and the assumptions were darker. The working model—that physical and cognitive decline are inevitable, that the goal is simply to slow the slide—is being replaced by something more accurate and more demanding.

This year’s research is specific in a way that earlier longevity science wasn’t. Not “exercise more” but exactly how many minutes. Not “stay social” but a precise mortality comparison that changes how seriously you should take it. Not “eat enough protein” but the number that’s almost certainly higher than what you’re currently targeting. Five findings from 2026 that are worth updating your operating assumptions around.

1. Decline Is Not the Default—But Your Mindset Makes It One

The starting premise most people bring to aging is wrong. A Yale School of Public Health studypublished in 2026 tracked nearly 4,000 adults ages 19 to 94 over three years and found that 45% of adults 65 and older improved in at least one area—roughly 32% improved cognitively and 28% improved physically. Led by researcher Becca R. Levy and published in the peer-reviewed journal Geriatrics, the study found something more actionable: People who held more positive attitudes about their own aging were significantly more likely to show these gains.

That’s not a motivational footnote. It’s a mechanism. The way you think about what’s coming shapes the biological and behavioral choices that determine whether it arrives. If you’ve already written off your 70s as a period of managed decline, you are actively contributing to that outcome. The practical move here is to audit the assumptions you’re carrying about your own future health because the data increasingly suggests they are the most important variable you can control.

2. The Exact Amount of Strength Training That Pays Off

For years, the advice has been vague: lift weights, build muscle, do resistance training. A June 2026 study in the British Journal of Sports Medicine finally puts a number on it. Researchers tracked 147,374 people over 30 years and found that 90 to 120 minutes of strength training per week was the longevity sweet spot, linked to a 13% lower risk of death from any cause, a 19% lower risk of death from cardiovascular disease and a 27% lower risk of death from neurological disease. Critically, they found no additional mortality benefit above 120 minutes per week.

That’s three sets of data points that change the conversation. First, the specific window (90-120 minutes) gives you an actual target instead of a vague directive. Second, the neurological protection finding—27% lower risk—is striking and underreported; most discussions of strength training focus on cardiovascular and metabolic benefits. Third, the ceiling matters: Doing more doesn’t help. Two focused sessions of 45 to 60 minutes weekly is not a beginner’s approach. It’s the evidence-backed optimum. If you’re already doing more, you may be spending time that could go elsewhere.

3. Cardio & Strength Together Are a Different Category

The same 30-year study found that combining strength training with aerobic exercise produces benefits that neither generates alone. Participants who accumulated high levels of both—30 to 44 MET hours of aerobic activity weekly alongside 60 to 119 minutes of strength training—saw a45% lower risk of death compared with those doing minimal amounts of either. At the highest aerobic volumes, mortality risk dropped 53% to 58% regardless of the amount of strength training.

The practical interpretation isn’t “do more.” It’s that aerobic and strength training operate on different biological pathways and stacking them produces compounding protection rather than redundant protection. If you’ve been treating your weekly workout as a choice between cardio and strength, the data argues for both—not as a performance goal, but as a longevity strategy. A structured week that includes three cardio sessions and two strength sessions, each around 45 minutes, clears both thresholds.

4. Social Isolation Has a Mortality Number, & It’s Alarming

Stanford Medicine’s longevity research for people in their 40s and 50s cites a finding that deserves more attention than it typically gets. A study analyzing data from 2.3 million adults,published in Nature, found that social isolation increases the risk of premature death by about 30%, a mortality risk comparable to smoking 15 cigarettes per day.

Most high-achievers in their 40s and 50s treat social connection as a discretionary item that gets trimmed when schedules are full. The data says this is a serious miscalculation. Stanford’s Abby King, Ph.D., who has spent decades researching health behaviors across the lifespan, frames this explicitly: “Social connection is really important for healthy aging—for your brain and for your emotional health. Finding ways to stay engaged with others, whether through community groups, volunteer work or simply maintaining close friendships, is one of the most protective things you can do for your long-term health.”

The midlife years—when careers and family demands peak—are precisely when social connection tends to contract. Building structural habits around it now (a standing dinner, a recurring commitment, a consistent community) isn’t a lifestyle choice. Based on the mortality data, it’s closer to a health intervention.

5. Your Protein Target Is Probably Too Low

The standard dietary recommendation for protein is 0.8 grams per kilogram of body weight per day. Stanford Medicine’s experts say that number is wrong for adults over 40, and the gap matters. Starting around age 40, you lose approximately 1% of muscle mass per year; the rate accelerates through your 50s. To counter that loss, Stanford’s research puts the effective target for adults over 40 at 1.0 to 1.2 grams of protein per kilogram of body weight daily, 25% to 50% higher than the standard recommendation.

For a 165-pound person, that means roughly 75 to 90 grams of protein per day, distributed across three meals of 20 to 30 grams each plus a 15- to 20-gram snack. Most people eating a standard Western diet fall significantly short of this, particularly at breakfast. The practical adjustment isn’t complicated—it’s adding a structured protein source to every meal rather than treating protein as incidental—but it requires knowing the actual target, which most people don’t.

https://www.success.com/longevity-research-2026-new-findings

..

Did someone forward this email to you? Get your own:

Disclosure

Indices that may be included herein are unmanaged indices and one cannot directly invest in an index. Index returns do not reflect the impact of any management fees, transaction costs or expenses. The index information included herein is for illustrative purposes only.

Material for market review represents an assessment of the market environment at a specific point in time and is not intended to be a forecast of future events, or a guarantee of future results.
Material compiled by Lansing Street Advisors is based on publicly available data at the time of compilation. Lansing Street Advisors makes no warranties or representation of any kind relating to the accuracy, completeness or timeliness of the data and shall not have liability for any damages of any kind relating to the use such data.

To the extent that content includes references to securities, those references do not constitute an offer or solicitation to buy, sell or hold such security as information is provided for educational purposes only. Articles should not be considered investment advice and the information contain within should not be relied upon in assessing whether or not to invest in any securities or asset classes mentioned. Articles have been prepared without regard to the individual financial circumstances and objectives of persons who receive it. Securities discussed may not be suitable for all investors. Please keep in mind that a company’s past financial performance, including the performance of its share price, does not guarantee future results.

Lansing Street Advisors is a registered investment adviser with the State of Pennsylvania.